Corrupt CA Gov Brown Uses Secrecy Law To Allow Discrimination Against State Workers In Bias Claim 1 Attachment


Corrupt CA Gov Brown Uses Secrecy Law To Allow Discrimination Against State Workers In Bias Claim
http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Review-reveals-governor-can-secretly-block-bias-5076600.php
Review reveals governor can secretly block bias claims
Melody Gutierrez
Updated 10:44 pm, Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Gov. Jerry Brown blocked a discrimination claim filed by an employee of a state agency in 2011 under a secret policy instituted by the previous governor. Photo: Sarah Rice, Special To The Chronicle

Sacramento —

Gov. Jerry Brown’s office blocked the stateDepartment of Fair Employment and Housingfrom taking action on a discrimination claim in 2011 filed by a government employee against a California agency, according to a Senate investigatory team that said the move was made in secret.

The Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes said it discovered the action during a review of the state Department of Fair Employment and Housing, the agency charged with investigating discrimination claims related to housing and employment in both the public and private sectors. The oversight office is a nonpartisan arm of the Senate created in 2008 to scrutinize government operations.

In a report released Wednesday, the oversight office said the governor’s office was able to block the discrimination claim because of a secret policy instituted during Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s administration. That policy, the report said, gives the governor’s office unchecked veto power over state Department of Fair Employment and Housing investigations that involve state and local government agencies as the employer.

“Taken to its extreme, it allows a California governor, in effect, to exempt public agencies from the state’s antidiscrimination law,” according to the report.

The practice raises ethical questions about use of power and transparency in government. The oversight office raised questions about whether the policy is lawful.

“People who interact with the government have a right to know what the rules are,” saidGary Blasi, a UCLA law professor who co-authored a critical study of the fair employment department in 2010. “It’s absolutely a fundamental element to due process that everyone knows what the rules are.”

Brown spokesman Evan Westrup contested the parts of the report involving the governor’s office.

“Contrary to this report’s deeply flawed claims, our focus is on protecting the rights of Californians while resolving disputes in the most fair and sensible manner,” Westrup said in the statement.

The report found budget cuts critically weakened the department’s enforcement of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, a 1959 civil rights statute that protects employees across the state from job discrimination and harassment. During the course of the Senate Oversight investigation, three former employees at the fair employment department revealed the little-known policy.

The department initially refused to confirm the existence of the policy, citing attorney-client and other legal privileges, according to the report. Department officials acknowledged the policy only after being “confronted with their own memos and other documents,” the report noted.

Melissa Figueroa, deputy secretary of communications of the State and Consumer Services Agency that oversees the fair employment department, disputed the characterization of the policy as a secret.

“The process is an effective way to communicate between agencies, departments and the Governor’s Office to ensure that the administration’s policies are being adhered to,” Figueroa said in a written response to The Chronicle.

In the report, the department would not say how often the policy was used under Schwarzenegger’s administration. Since Brown took office nearly three years ago, 10 cases were submitted to his office for approval. One case was denied in February 2011, four were allowed to move forward, and five were withdrawn after the cases were settled, according to the report.

The fair employment department refused to release details to Senate oversight staff members about the lone blocked case. The department said it is looking into a request made Wednesday by The Chronicle.

While the Fair Employment and Housing Act protects both public and private workers, the report said the policy of signing off on claims against state and local government entities has unfairly added an obstacle for public employees not faced by private workers.

“I think the governor’s secret policy is striking a lot of people because of the obvious questions of impartiality,” said Dorothy Korber, who co-authored the report as a principal consultant to the Senate oversight office. “The big thing for me is that this law is really important. It brings people justice. A lot of people who can’t find justice any other way go to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. Their claims deserve attention.”

Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, said the policy exposed by the oversight office needs to be fully explained to the public.

“The policy could be justified, but we don’t know the rationale,” said Steinberg, who created the office. “We have an obligation as a Legislature to conduct vigorous oversight.”

The report noted that investigations that reach the governor’s desk have already been deemed meritorious by the fair employment department.

Department Director Phyllis Cheng said in a written statement that she respectfully disagrees with many of the report’s conclusions.

“The department has aided thousands of victims of discrimination in the public and private sectors statewide and has doubled the value of its judgments and settlements since 2009,” Cheng said. “We continue to resolve more cases through mediation, outside of courts, and are increasingly more accessible to the public, capturing thousands more complaints online.”

Melody Gutierrez is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail:mgutierrez Twitter: @MelodyGutierrez

Advertisements

About Mad Scientist

Member of California Association of Professional Scientists
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Corrupt CA Gov Brown Uses Secrecy Law To Allow Discrimination Against State Workers In Bias Claim 1 Attachment

  1. hillsfan says:

    The Department of Developmental Disabilities (DDS) is compromised. For example, the DDS governs 21 regional centers. However, one of these 21 regional centers is involved in a great conflict of interest that everyone paid by CALIF. funding in this system, has tried to cover up. For instance, Carlos Flores, is the Executive Director of San DIego Regional Center, and his wife, Nina Garrett is the Assistant Chief of Case Management at the same regional center, but the use different last names so not a lot of people know this. Even worse, Carlos Flores is on the ridiculous “task force” comprised by people at the Dept. of Developmental Disabilities, the same agency that funds and governs regional centers, only we all know by now that this is a front. A ruse. A total scam. A joke. A corrupted organization that is a front to gain money for pretending to help the disabled when in reality the top employees at DDS and all these regional centers are funneling monies into other areas that have nothing to do with directly helping disabled people. This entire system serving disabled is compromised. We have judges that are paid by the same funding mechanism that funds the DDS and REgional center systems. We have Client advocacy agencies that are funded by the SAME DDS funding mechanisms that are told they can’t appeal cases when an administrative Judge, funded by the same system makes an idiotic or compromised by higher influence decision. The system serving disabled in California is one of the most corrupted systems that has ever been seen and it must be exposed for the sham it is. What is Governor Brown doing about this? Answer: NOTHING. He clearly doesn’t give a damn about the corruption in the California’s Regional Centers. Did you know that if you have a complaint that your child is being discriminated against, you must ask the Regional Center director to investigate, then he/she assigns another regional center employee, who has NO expertise in investigations, to “investigate” the complaint. Almost always, the regional center designee assigned to “investigate” finds “no wrongdoing.”. It’s a complete SCAM. Congress needs to do a serious investigation into all the California Regional Centers. They are ripping the public off. They aren’t delivering services to families who are in crisis. They are covering up their own mistakes by having their own employees and buddies at their governing agency, Dept. of Developmental Services, cover their butts. It’s totally out of control and must be investigated and exposed. NOW. The complaints about California’s corrupt system serving disabled have been going on for years, when the hell is our congress going to respond?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s